24 hour legal helpline
Zero Fee Promise
Indianapolis Attorneys for Personal Injury
GET A FREE CASE EVALUATION NOW
Car Accident Lawyers
Indiana Personal Injury Lawyer Blog

How Does Comparative Fault Work in Indiana?

HELP IS MINUTES AWAY

Indiana Personal Injury Attorneys Best Indiana Personal Injury Lawyers Indianapolis Car Accident Lawyers Car Accident Lawyers

5.0

Indiana Car Accident Attorneys Best Indianapolis Car Accident Lawyers Car Accident Attorneys Personal Injury Lawyer Best Indianapolis Personal Injury Lawyer

Out of 547 Reviews

personal injury lawyer indianapolis

Personal injury victims can share fault for their accidents in several scenarios. If you share some of the blame for your accident, you may still obtain payment for the harm you suffered. However, the amount of payment you are awarded can be limited.

In cases involving negligence by multiple persons, Indiana courts will award damages based on each party’s percentage of fault. However, those who are considered to be over 50% responsible for their accidents will be restricted from pursuing claims against other parties. During your free case review, our team can analyze the circumstances of your case to determine how damages may be apportioned.

If you were hurt because of another party’s negligence, get help from our experienced Indiana personal injury attorneys at Wruck Paupore by calling (219) 322-1166.

Comparative Fault in Indiana

There are several ways that victims can share fault for their accidents in Indiana. Fortunately, even if you are partially to blame for your harmful accident, you may still recover compensation for your injuries. However, the amount of damages you are awarded may be reduced proportionately.

Indiana courts abide by the doctrine of “modified comparative fault” when apportioning damages in personal injury cases. In other words, damages are awarded based on each party’s percentage of blame. For example, if you are 15% liable for your car crash while the other driver is 85% at fault, they will have to pay for 85% of the damages you sustained while you are left to account for the remaining 15%.

It is important to note that victims who are over 50% responsible for their accidents will be prevented from recovering payment from any other parties. At-fault parties often try to shift blame onto victims in personal injury cases in order to avoid paying for the damages that are owed.

Accordingly, support and guidance from our Indianapolis personal injury lawyers can be highly valuable when pursuing your potential claim. Our team can collect and preserve the information required to prove your case. Further, we can employ effective strategies to disprove any alternative theories of fault.

Examples of Accidents Caused by Comparative Fault

There are several ways that fault may be shared for certain accidents. For instance, the following are all examples of accidents caused by contributory or comparative negligence:

Car Accidents

In a car accident, if one driver runs a red light and another is speeding, both parties may share fault. Even if the speeding driver couldn't avoid the collision because of the red-light runner, they might still be found partially at fault because of their excessive speed.

Another example is when a driver changes lanes without signaling and strikes a speeding car in the adjacent lane. In such a case, both drivers may share fault for the collision because of their traffic violations.

Slip and Fall Accidents

In slip and fall cases, comparative fault can come into play if the injured party was distracted or not paying attention. For instance, if someone slips on a wet floor but was texting on their phone at the time, their damages might be reduced because of their own inattention.

Furthermore, comparative fault may become an issue if a person slips and falls in a store but was wearing inappropriate footwear for the conditions, like high heels on a rainy day. In such a scenario, the injured party's choice of footwear may be considered by a jury as to whether that choice was unreasonable.

Pedestrian Accidents

If a pedestrian is struck by a car while jaywalking, they may be deemed partially responsible for their injuries. In that case, the at-fault driver may argue that the pedestrian's disregard for traffic laws contributed to the accident.

Furthermore, fault may be shared for a collision if a pedestrian ignores a "walk" signal at an intersection and walks into oncoming traffic. In this case, both the pedestrian and the driver may be to blame.

Bicycle Accidents

Also, if a cyclist fails to obey traffic signals and collides with a vehicle, both parties may share fault for their crash. The cyclist's failure to follow the rules of the road could be considered to be partially or entirely at fault.

For instance, a cyclist may ride on the wrong side of the road and sustain a crash with a distracted driver. In that case, both the cyclist's wrong-way riding and the driver's distraction may be considered factors that contributed to the accident.

Truck Accidents

In a truck accident, fault may be shared if a speeding truck driver is struck by a vehicle that was following too closely. In that case, both the truck driver’s excessive speed and the other motorist’s tailgating could be seen as causes of the accident at issue.

Another example may involve a truck driver who failed to properly secure cargo that fell onto a tailgating driver’s car. In such a case, both the truck driver's negligence and the following driver's failure to maintain a safe distance may have led to the crash.

Motorcycle Accidents

Finally, there are many ways that fault can be shared for motorcycle collisions. For instance, fault may be shared if a drunk or distracted driver struck a speeding motorcyclist. Fortunately, the team at our firm can help victims of such accidents fight for the full range of damages they are owed.

How Long Do You Have to File a Case Involving Comparative Fault in Indiana?

The time limit to file a personal injury case in Indiana is governed by I.C. § 34-11-2-4(a)(1). Typically, victims will have two years from the date of their accident to file their claims.

Still, in cases involving comparative fault, establishing fault may be more complicated. Victims who share blame for their accidents may have to spend more time building their claims. Therefore, if you need to file a personal injury case involving contributory negligence in Indiana, you should begin working on your case as soon as possible.

Contact Our Personal Injury Attorneys for Help with Your Claim in Indiana

Seek assistance from our experienced Gary, IN personal injury lawyers by calling Wruck Paupore today at (219) 322-1166.

Proven Results

$25,000,000

Traumatic Brain Injury

Client injured in auto accident after driver ran stop sign.

$940,000

Post-Concussion Disorder

Women rear-ended while stopped at red light

$1,250,000

Medical Malpractice

Patient suffering nerve damage following hip operation.

$12,000,000

Semi-truck Accident

Woman suffering a traumatic brain injury following semi-truck accident.

$10,500,000

Slip and Fall

Woman suffering severe hip and ankle fracture after falling on defective step.

$797,000

Post-Concussion Disorder

Man suffered headaches and other post-concussion symptoms from vehicle crash.

$1,750,000

Semi-Truck Accident

Woman suffering post-concussion syndrome after vehicle rear-ended by tractor trailer.

$7,250,000

Traumatic Brain Injury

Man physically assaulted at his workplace.

$875,000

Nursing Home Abuse

Woman suffering physical and emotional abuse at nursing home.

$945,000

Auto Accident

Woman suffered from an ankle fracture after a truck turned in front of her vehicle.

$1,525,000

Auto Accident

Man suffered back injury after head-on collision.

***Every case is unique and your results will differ. Contact us for a free case review of your circumstance.

""
""
– Pat D.
"After being involved in a car accident, I was very fortunate to work with Don Wruck. He explained everything to me and my family and made me feel involved in all decisions. I was very happy with the result of my case and happy to have found this firm!"
– Kayla D.
"My case wasn’t very large, but they made it easy to recover damages when the insurance company didn’t even want to cover basic costs. The firm was responsive to my inquiries, and very clear about what was required and what could be expected, during every step of the process."
– Wayne M.
"From start to finish, Wruck Paupore PC Law were the best! Knowledgeable and straightforward, they explained the process, start to finish, and gave guidance while allowing us to determine the best course of action to take. We would highly recommend them and would certainly use them again."
– Chris V.
"We are so thankful with how the lawyers and staff handled our case. The folks at Wruck and Paupore were always pleasant and helpful in all their phone calls and letters. It was always a pleasure to get their calls. We were especially pleased with their tenacious pursuit of the goal of full recovery which was far greater than we could have imagined."
– Jay Zoellner
"Attorney Wruck did an amazing job in settling my personal injury case. His knowledge and experience specific to semi truck accidents made all of the difference in the outcome of my case; the settlement exceeded my expectations! The staff at his firm was helpful, responsive and caring during a difficult time following a life-altering experience. I highly recommend Attorney Wruck and his firm."
– J B
"Attorney Wruck did an amazing job in settling my personal injury case. His knowledge and experience specific to semi-truck accidents made all of the difference in the outcome of my case; the settlement exceeded my expectations!"
– James M.
"Exceptional team. They took on my case and made sure that I was consulted on every issue. If it wasn’t for the caring staff and my legal team I don’t know what I would have done. Everyone did an awesome job thanks so much for your help."
– Rhonda M.
""
– Adriana
"Wruck Paupore was fantastic. I was informed every step of the way, they did all of the work, and I got my case settled."
– Idell J.
""
""
"It was awesome watching Donald Wruck at work during mediation. He really fights for his clients."
– Lisa L.
"Wruck Paupore did more than they promised and did all of the work. I was worried about bills and dealing with insurance people. They did everything while I recovered. They were not concerned about earning money but about helping me and my husband."
– Edithe P.
"Don did a great job on my case! Staff was amazing! Kept me in the loop the entire time. I highly recommend!!!!"
– Dana L.
""
"A great experience from beginning to settlement. Handled our case from start to finish. Explained every step and communicated very well."
– William H.

Your Legal Team

Your Legal Team


Top-Rated Litigator.
Helping injury victims move forward.

Don is a founding partner and one of the nation’s top-ranked personal injury litigators. He is a member of the Multi-million Dollar Advocates Forum, which includes less than 1% of the nation’s trial lawyers, and awarded the highest ranking given by Martindale Hubbel and AVVO.

More importantly, Don understands representing personal injury victims is about more than recovering the best settlement: it’s about helping clients get back on their feet and supporting them in every aspect of their recovery.

Best Indiana Auto Accident Lawyer
Understanding the Insurance Company:
Getting Results.

In nearly all cases, our clients seek compensation from the wrongdoer’s insurance company. Before forming Wruck Paupore, Jason worked for a prominent law firm representing some of the world’s largest insurers. This experience gives Jason a deep understanding of the insurance industry and the strategies it uses to pay injury victims as little as possible.

Jason -- and our entire team -- put this inside knowledge to work to force insurance companies to pay what is actually owed. Often, we use the insurance company’s own tactics against them as we fight for the full compensation our client deserves.

Best Personal Injury Lawyers Indianapolis
More than 40 Years of Experience.
Still Fighting for Justice.

For more than four decades, Keith has been fighting for injury victims. During that time, he’s watched the insurance industry change, with insurers now more interested in protecting their stock price than treating injury victims fairly.

Since the beginning, Keith has put people first. From his childhood in Gary, Indiana during the 1960’s and working his way through law school, Keith has risen to become one of the Midwest’s most respected trial lawyers. He has never forgotten that being a lawyer is about helping people -- and seeing injury victims through struggles in a way that could change their lives forever.

Over the decades, Keith, Don and Jason have fought relentlessly for clients, even when other lawyers have said the case was impossible to win.

Best Nursing Home Abuse Lawyers Indiana

Proven Results


Indianapolis Personal Injruy Attorneys
Indianapolis Personal Injruy Attorneys
Indianapolis Personal Injruy Attorneys
Indianapolis Personal Injruy Attorneys
Indianapolis Personal Injruy Attorneys
Indianapolis Personal Injruy Attorneys
Indianapolis Personal Injruy Attorneys
Indianapolis Personal Injruy Attorneys
***Every case is unique and your results will differ. Contact us for a free case review of your circumstance.

Real Client Testimonials